Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
en:electronics:antenna-theory:dipole-derivation [2014/10/20 22:43]
alex
en:electronics:antenna-theory:dipole-derivation [2014/10/20 23:04]
alex
Line 148: Line 148:
 E_\theta &=& -j \omega A_T \\ E_\theta &=& -j \omega A_T \\
 A_T &=& A_z \sin \theta \\ A_T &=& A_z \sin \theta \\
-E_\theta &=& \frac{-j \omega \mu I_0 e^{-jkr}}{2\pi r k \sin \theta} \left [ \cos \left (\frac{kL}{2} \cos \theta \right ) - \cos \left( \frac{kL}{2} \right) \right ]+E_\theta &=& \frac{-j \omega \eta I_0 e^{-jkr}}{2\pi r k \sin \theta} \left [ \cos \left (\frac{kL}{2} \cos \theta \right ) - \cos \left( \frac{kL}{2} \right) \right ]
 \end{eqnarray*} \end{eqnarray*}
  
 This equation for $E_\theta$ is the general form for the theta component in spherical coordinates of the far-field E field of a dipole antenna of any length oriented along the z-axis. ​ The r component is zero due to the far-field assumption and the phi component is zero due to the electric field'​s orientation along the z-axis.  ​ This equation for $E_\theta$ is the general form for the theta component in spherical coordinates of the far-field E field of a dipole antenna of any length oriented along the z-axis. ​ The r component is zero due to the far-field assumption and the phi component is zero due to the electric field'​s orientation along the z-axis.  ​